Thoughts on the new Trail Plus 300 DC.
With the release of the new Trail Plus 300 DC unit, I see people asking why they should get a new unit with old battery chemistry - why get a unit with an NCM battery that drops to 80% after around 400 cycles instead of the base 300 DC with an LFP battery that takes around 3000 cycles to drop to 80%? There are reasons.The Plus unit adds WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity with the app, which (for me) is a huge improvement. It allows you to monitor the unit charge level and port state remotely, and potentially (to be confirmed - I haven’t seen the options for this unit in the app) options to control ports, charge rates, charge limits, and the light. In addition, the app allows for firmware upgrades, which may help improve functionality in the future.The Plus unit also adds:1. An extra 140W USB-C port.2. An integrated Camping Light.3. A 140W USB cord in the handle.All of these features are significant improvements.So, what about the NCM battery and “only” taking about 400 cycles to get to 80% of original capacity? In reality, for most people this will not be a real issue. If you fully cycle the unit (from 100% to zero, and back to 100%) once a day, the drop of capacity after a year will be significant, but in reality most people won’t do a full cycle more than once a week (on average), and partial cycles (e.g., 100% to 40%) have a much lower impact on the unit than a full cycle - two 100% to 50% cycles have less impact than one full cycle, for example. With the equivalent of one full cycle a week, it would take almost 8 years to hit 400 cycles! And if you are someone who would cycle the 300WH unit daily, 365 days a year, then the Trail 300 (either version) is too small for your needs anyway!I’m saying all the above as someone who doesn’t have a Trail 300 Plus, and has no need for one (I already have plenty of units of a wide range of sizes and features), and would love to hear from people who are considering one.